waterinjection.info

waterinjection.info (http://www.aquamist.co.uk/forum2/vbulletin/index.php)
-   Gasoline Forced-Induction (http://www.aquamist.co.uk/forum2/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?f=17)
-   -   Direct Port EVO IX rs HFS3 (http://www.aquamist.co.uk/forum2/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2860)

parmas 23-03-2016 04:02 PM

Re: Direct Port EVO IX rs HFS3
 
:)
Quote:

Originally Posted by rotrex (Post 22347)
I mean with this than unless you inject large amounts of methanol, especially pre turbo like you, IATs won't drop that much. Most of the knock suppression happens due to the water droplets in the cylinder and the high octane of the methanol.

To put the information right... during mixture trials with 100% water vs water/meth @ different percentages, best maximum ignition advance = best knock suppressor was found to be when injecting 100% water. Also IAT was found somewhere in the similar ranges.

The small improvement in IAT with Water/Meth mixed was due to the theory that with meth you can go above 100% Relative humidity. The advantage of using water only was also that after closing throttle, IAT continued to cool for more time although not injecting vs water/meth since meth dissolves earlier than water

In order to reach the same ignition advance I used a mixture of Water/Meth 60/40 with 44% being W.I and 56% being pump fuel. Almost running 20% methanol burn...


Your system is a bit special, indeed and shows significant drops in IAT. But you also have no change cooler. Your system is optimised to both drop IAT and get mix into the cylinder.

if you inject way less past a charge cooler, not to much IAT drop will happen. Most knock suppression is due to in cylinder effects.

Why using a charge cooler then..... :confused: if you have water injection ?

Your install is also a good example what you can achieve with WI given you inject enough. 500ml/min for a 430HP engine in the OP' car is not what I consider a lot.

Cheers :)

:-)

I am looking forward to some warmer weather to properly test the new bigger direct port nozzles.

Good to hear you car is still running strong.

...........

Iguanapeluda 29-03-2016 08:53 PM

Re: Direct Port EVO IX rs HFS3
 
Well....Today I have removed my intake manifold and the surprise is that the cleaning of the intake valves...

http://i65.tinypic.com/2yxr602.jpg
http://i66.tinypic.com/10ojgc0.jpg
http://i64.tinypic.com/nvvek9.jpg
http://i66.tinypic.com/10ojgc0.jpg

And the intake manifold

http://i68.tinypic.com/1zb9da0.jpg

And the shippment of Aquamist...all perfect:

http://i67.tinypic.com/2zs88w2.jpg

Richard L 29-03-2016 09:11 PM

Re: Direct Port EVO IX rs HFS3
 
Have you been running water injection before the strip down?

I can see your toys have arrived...

Iguanapeluda 29-03-2016 10:33 PM

Re: Direct Port EVO IX rs HFS3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard L (Post 22429)
Have you been running water injection before the strip down?

I can see your toys have arrived...


hi Richard, the toys are all perfect to install it..:):):)

The first question I donīt knock translate exacly "strip down"..sorry

Richard L 29-03-2016 11:00 PM

Re: Direct Port EVO IX rs HFS3
 
I meant before the manifold was taken off.

Iguanapeluda 29-03-2016 11:03 PM

Re: Direct Port EVO IX rs HFS3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard L (Post 22431)
I meant before the manifold was taken off.

No no, my car doesnīt have meth, this is my first time that I have to install it and I want to try understand this system with a dyno day....

you will help me in 1 month...:p

Richard L 30-03-2016 07:16 AM

Re: Direct Port EVO IX rs HFS3
 
The inlet tracts are very clean so I though you might have w/m injection before.

Iguanapeluda 30-03-2016 10:43 PM

Re: Direct Port EVO IX rs HFS3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard L (Post 22434)
The inlet tracts are very clean so I though you might have w/m injection before.

Yes, there are very clean, and this engine never has installed Meth, I know the last driverīs.

Well...What number do you like more?

http://i65.tinypic.com/11ug568.jpg
http://i64.tinypic.com/2z4mu68.jpg

Richard L 30-03-2016 10:56 PM

Re: Direct Port EVO IX rs HFS3
 
If you are referring to the direct port jets, 1 is good.

Iguanapeluda 30-03-2016 11:10 PM

Re: Direct Port EVO IX rs HFS3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard L (Post 22438)
If you are referring to the direct port jets, 1 is good.

Yes is for the direct port, I think that in the mark number 1 don`t have the suficient time to evaporate or mix with the air...jaja

But if you say me number 1. Tomorrow I will put in this place.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.