Quote:
Originally Posted by dblrguy
Next question is what computer is smarter. The one you programmed in the Aquamist system or the one Shiv uses in the Procede. Are there benefits of using one letting the procede tell when to inject meth over letting the Aquamist system read all the ECU information from the standard install and just tell the procede when meth is flowing for map switching?
|
If you are running Procede, it is better to let it control the water/meth flow and onset of failsafe.
Both HFS4 and Procede reference load as prime flow control from multiple sensors. Procede controls flow from raw sensor signals compared to HFS-4 reads composite Fuel injector signals as well as boost and fuel rail pressure. Both methods are very competent performers.
If you are running a flash tune, let the HFS-4 control the flow and failsafe.