waterinjection.info  

Go Back   waterinjection.info > Injection Applications (making it work) > Gasoline Forced-Induction

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 01-11-2004, 03:34 PM
JohnA JohnA is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 352
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slump
This is a dyno of my car.

The blue line is "too much water", and the red line is a more correct amount of water.

The only difference between the two dyno runs is the adjustment of the quantity of water injected using the Aquamist MF2 controller (part of the System 2S).

Interestingly, the blue 'drowning' run also appears to be much richer in fuel.
Did the extra water fool the oxygen sensor, or did you also change the fuelling as well?
__________________
Cheers,

John

www.max-boost.co.uk
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-11-2004, 10:10 PM
Richard L Richard L is offline
Manufacturer sponsor
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: England
Posts: 4,936
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slump
This is a dyno of my car.

The blue line is "too much water", and the red line is a more correct amount of water.

The only difference between the two dyno runs is the adjustment of the quantity of water injected using the Aquamist MF2 controller (part of the System 2S).


What jet size were you using for this chart?
__________________
Richard L
aquamist technical support
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-11-2004, 10:11 PM
Richard L Richard L is offline
Manufacturer sponsor
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: England
Posts: 4,936
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slump
This is a dyno of my car.

The blue line is "too much water", and the red line is a more correct amount of water.

The only difference between the two dyno runs is the adjustment of the quantity of water injected using the Aquamist MF2 controller (part of the System 2S).

Interestingly, the blue 'drowning' run also appears to be much richer in fuel.
Did the extra water fool the oxygen sensor, or did you also change the fuelling as well?
I am also interested...
__________________
Richard L
aquamist technical support
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-11-2004, 11:48 AM
Gelf Gelf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Astra Coupe Turbo in Wiltshire UK
Posts: 85
Default

Yes, we need info on the effects of WI on the oxygen sensor :!:
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-11-2004, 02:42 PM
DuMaurier 7 DuMaurier 7 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 50
Default

You can feel the effects of over injection and if you have an exhaust tem. gauge you'll see it there too . I've meen over injecting for a little while , my exhaust temps moved from 1400 deg. F to 1000 deg.F , there was also a slight reduction in the "harsheness " of the car 's power.
My a/f ratios were also fairly rich 10-10.5 : 1 without any ignition breakup or bogging ! , Thats because I have an MSD 6 A on each of my leading plugs. :!:
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 22-07-2006, 12:26 AM
hamton hamton is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1
Default

I want to start WI for my car, but I noticed in the dyno below, a user that used WI, he lost power from 3500RPM and higher. Under 3500 RPM there is a huge gain. Is this the result of too much water or the ECU being too sensitive? Now he has other mods along with a custom tune.

http://forums.swedespeed.com/zerothread?id=42148

Info about the car at the time.
2005 Volvo S40 T5 with custom catback exhaust. At stock, the car produces 218HP / 236 ft-lbs torque. The 2.5liter inline 5 engine uses a small low pressure turbo that produces a max of 10psi.

In the forum he specifies he was using an aquamist is 1S system. triggered 0.5 bar. 0.6mm injector.

I have basicly the same car with a few other mods: BSR Stage 1, K&N, EuroSport catback. The BSR raises the psi to 15 and I'm guessing more fuel delivery. I was planning on using Aquamist 1s with .5mm injector and 100% distilled water but after seeing this, I'm a little discouraged. BSR does not do custom programming. I'm just curious if the same power loss will happen to me.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 29-11-2006, 04:49 AM
hotrod hotrod is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 307
Default

The Buick GN folks frequently would tune by "feel" and discribe the effect of too much water injection as the car begins to "feel soggy". The throttle response gets softer, and it just feels a bit sluggish.

In that dyno plot I suspect what you are seeing is the result of improved air density at lower rpms. The cooling effect due to evaporation would likely increase your VE significantly especially in the lower rpm ranges where the mixture spends enough time in the manifold for some evaporation to take place. WI tends to slow down the burn speed slightly so it in effect would retard the ignition timing slightly. At low rpm that is not too big a deal but the combination of excess cooling lowering cylinder pressures at high rpm and not enough ignition timing would effect top end more I suspect.

If he could lean out his fuel mixture at high rpm he would probably get his power back for two reasons. Combustion temperatures would increase due to the leaner mixtures and he would get a slightly faster burn.

What the Buick GN guys would do is keep increasing injection rate until they felt that soggy feeling in the engine response, then they would lean it out, add boost or increase timing advance until they started to see signs of detonation or the car slowed down. Then repeat the cycle until the car no longer gets quicker.

Each car is unique in its needs so you can only extend someone elses dyno experience in a general way. Just give the car what it wants. If you make small incremental changes and monitor how the car responds it will tell you what it likes.

Larry
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.