waterinjection.info  

Go Back   waterinjection.info > Injection Applications (making it work) > Gasoline Forced-Induction

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 11-04-2016, 06:19 AM
FI_Rubicon FI_Rubicon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: California
Posts: 64
Default Re: Water vs Methanol : Ultimate Tuning

Looking at the diagram it seems that this may work with a TV Supercharger. Would this make sense for a SC as well? It is not super high boost, peaking at just 10psi on a stock NA motor.


I am running Aquamist jets now and wonder if I can improve atomization. Will running a greater number of jets to achieve the same flow rate improve the atomization? In other words, if I switch from the current 1.2mm and 0.4mm jets to four jets (say two 0.5mm and two 0.4mm) improve atomization by a significant degree? I have some real-estate to work with on the intake tract and can pout four jets, while spacing them apart and keeping them in front of the throttle body.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 11-04-2016, 12:16 PM
parmas parmas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: malta
Posts: 210
Default Re: Water vs Methanol : Ultimate Tuning

Quote:
Originally Posted by rotrex View Post
This threat shows install pictures:
http://www.rx7club.com/auxiliary-inj...-pics-1031140/

Why would you install a pre-turbo injection that goes first into the filter? Is there a hole or something?

A diagram:
http://www.mx6.com/forums/2g-mx6-for...ml#post2606465

Ok let's say I have a five gallon tank with lots of tubing. Does all this boost used by this setup causes boost lag? I think the less fluid in the tank -> the more boost the setup needs to work causing variable boost lag.
The nozzle seems interested though if it's true that produces fine mist with 40 or less psi. What if you use this nozzle with 200psi ?


A video:
http://youtu.be/8Lizxy3XIY8

Nice video. I just left him a comment to understand how much pressure he used.

Depending on pressure and flow, you get median droplet diameters of half the total volume in the range of 30-80 microns with air assisted nozzles while hydraulic nozzles are more in the range of 200-500µm. The media diameters over total number of droplets are in the range of some five to 5-20 µm vs. 100-200 µm. These numbers are not hard numbers as every manufacturer and type of nozzle acts a little different.

there is a reason you go for air assisted if smallest droplets are a main factor for performance, e.g. Paint spray, cooling in manufacturing processes, e.g. Plastic milling, or humidification systems.

Why would they use air assisted nozzles with hydraulic pumps? That would be awesome misting right?

It has its merits, I'd therefore not slag it off just because Snow XXX does not sell it.

Why would you not even consider a small air to air cooler? The benefits for performance would be tremendous.

I had one big fat intercooler. The result? Lots of boost lag / Complicated setup / Mess of piping / drops only a fixed amount of heat. With water injection I gained three times as much better air cooling + better throttle response + easy setup removal -- only one 20cm pipe !

Regards
Marko
..........
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 11-04-2016, 08:17 PM
rotrex rotrex is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 187
Default Re: Water vs Methanol : Ultimate Tuning

there is a hole in the air filter indeed. the spray is injected right through this hole.

For the tank you mount a check valve in the pressure supply line. Once the container is pressurised, it stays pressurised. 20l or about 5 gallons of compressed are generated by your turbocharger within some 200 Milliseconds for a 300HP air flow.

After that you only need to replenish the air replacing the fluid.
One example found here
http://www.sprayernozzle.com.tw/down.../CTGAZ18BR.pdf
sprays 500ml/min (30l/h) using 60l of air per minute or 1l per second at 0.7 bar. At 300Hp your car needs 250l of air per second! The loss is insignificant. The same is valid to fill the container.

Hydraulic nozzles are spray nozzles driven by high fluid pressure. It is what most of us are using.

Working with not too big pipes (for 300HP, 50mm is still OK), not too bog of a IC and a blow off valve, lag due to a intercooler should be minimal on full chat. I see the simplicity of your approach and plumbing a IC is a lot of work. I also tried just WM injection, but had worse results compared to both CC and water injection.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 12-04-2016, 12:18 AM
Flr Power Flr Power is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 62
Default Re: Water vs Methanol : Ultimate Tuning

Quote:
Originally Posted by FI_Rubicon View Post
I am running Aquamist jets now and wonder if I can improve atomization. Will running a greater number of jets to achieve the same flow rate improve the atomization? In other words, if I switch from the current 1.2mm and 0.4mm jets to four jets (say two 0.5mm and two 0.4mm) improve atomization by a significant degree? I have some real-estate to work with on the intake tract and can pout four jets, while spacing them apart and keeping them in front of the throttle body.
Yes it will but is it really needed? I like 0.8mm size jet and below to keep atomization good. On your application, I would split that 1.2mm jet for sure and keep them in front of the throttle body.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 12-04-2016, 04:34 AM
FI_Rubicon FI_Rubicon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: California
Posts: 64
Default Re: Water vs Methanol : Ultimate Tuning

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flr Power View Post
Yes it will but is it really needed? I like 0.8mm size jet and below to keep atomization good. On your application, I would split that 1.2mm jet for sure and keep them in front of the throttle body.
Cool. Thanks. My original plan was indeed to split the 1.2mm jet into two smaller ones that are more equally sized, so it is good to know that I do not need to add more jets.

I have dual jets now but it is just one very large (1.0 or 1.2) one with one very small one (0.4-B). I also have them mounted at 2 o'clock and 10 o'clock in the same silicon coupler. I was thinking to spread them out and maybe put one in the end of the inverted cone air filter that I have. It would point the nozzle right down the intake tract.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 23-04-2016, 05:46 AM
parmas parmas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: malta
Posts: 210
Default Re: Water vs Methanol : Ultimate Tuning

Here is an interesting thesis regarding Ethanol and Water injection at different water mixtures providing detailed information.

Thanks to Rotrex for sharing and to Baine Breaux for actually doing it.

Full Thesis here : http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/et...Thesis2012.pdf

I took the time to read it carefully and took notes from it. I am attaching the notes phrased from the thesis itself into a pdf.

I am also attaching graphs should anyone make use of them.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg ADIABATIC FLAME TEMP.jpg (22.3 KB, 6 views)
File Type: jpg EXHAUST GAS TEMP.jpg (35.4 KB, 4 views)
File Type: jpg LATENT HEAT OF VAPORIZATION.jpg (26.7 KB, 5 views)
File Type: jpg C02 EQUILIBRIUM.jpg (21.4 KB, 5 views)
Attached Files
File Type: pdf THE EFFECT OF ELEVATED WATER CONTENT ON ETHANOL COMBUSTION.doc.PDF (74.7 KB, 5 views)

Last edited by parmas; 23-04-2016 at 06:18 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 23-04-2016, 05:47 AM
parmas parmas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: malta
Posts: 210
Default Re: Water vs Methanol : Ultimate Tuning

More pictures from THE EFFECT OF ELEVATED WATER CONTENT ON ETHANOL COMBUSTION
Attached Images
File Type: jpg FLAME PICTURES.jpg (19.5 KB, 5 views)
File Type: jpg MASS AIR FUEL RATIO.jpg (23.9 KB, 4 views)
File Type: jpg DROP SIZE.jpg (16.0 KB, 6 views)
File Type: jpg FUEL EQUIVALENCE RATIO.jpg (27.5 KB, 9 views)
File Type: jpg SINGLE POINT NOZZLE CAPACITY.jpg (27.3 KB, 6 views)
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 23-04-2016, 06:11 AM
parmas parmas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: malta
Posts: 210
Default Re: Water vs Methanol : Ultimate Tuning

More pictures from THE EFFECT OF ELEVATED WATER CONTENT ON ETHANOL COMBUSTION
Attached Images
File Type: jpg received_1301429746538227.jpg (75.9 KB, 4 views)
File Type: jpg received_1301429946538207.jpg (25.7 KB, 3 views)
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 23-04-2016, 06:14 AM
parmas parmas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: malta
Posts: 210
Default Re: Water vs Methanol : Ultimate Tuning

Here another Thesis directly related to internal combustion N/A engine and water injection.

Thanks to Gurveer Jatana for his research.

https://espace.cdu.edu.au/eserv/cdu:...3_Jatana_G.pdf

Attaching graphs and pictures that attracted me.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg received_1301429763204892.jpg (50.3 KB, 9 views)
File Type: jpg received_1301429783204890.jpg (52.9 KB, 6 views)
File Type: jpg received_1301429816538220.jpg (81.7 KB, 6 views)
File Type: jpg received_1301429869871548.jpg (60.5 KB, 4 views)
File Type: jpg received_1301429886538213.jpg (46.4 KB, 5 views)
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 23-04-2016, 06:15 AM
parmas parmas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: malta
Posts: 210
Default Re: Water vs Methanol : Ultimate Tuning

Last one.............
Attached Images
File Type: jpg received_1301429936538208.jpg (107.1 KB, 10 views)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.