waterinjection.info  

Go Back   waterinjection.info > Injection Applications (making it work) > Gasoline Forced-Induction

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 23-03-2016, 04:02 PM
parmas parmas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: malta
Posts: 210
Default Re: Direct Port EVO IX rs HFS3

Quote:
Originally Posted by rotrex View Post
I mean with this than unless you inject large amounts of methanol, especially pre turbo like you, IATs won't drop that much. Most of the knock suppression happens due to the water droplets in the cylinder and the high octane of the methanol.

To put the information right... during mixture trials with 100% water vs water/meth @ different percentages, best maximum ignition advance = best knock suppressor was found to be when injecting 100% water. Also IAT was found somewhere in the similar ranges.

The small improvement in IAT with Water/Meth mixed was due to the theory that with meth you can go above 100% Relative humidity. The advantage of using water only was also that after closing throttle, IAT continued to cool for more time although not injecting vs water/meth since meth dissolves earlier than water

In order to reach the same ignition advance I used a mixture of Water/Meth 60/40 with 44% being W.I and 56% being pump fuel. Almost running 20% methanol burn...


Your system is a bit special, indeed and shows significant drops in IAT. But you also have no change cooler. Your system is optimised to both drop IAT and get mix into the cylinder.

if you inject way less past a charge cooler, not to much IAT drop will happen. Most knock suppression is due to in cylinder effects.

Why using a charge cooler then..... if you have water injection ?

Your install is also a good example what you can achieve with WI given you inject enough. 500ml/min for a 430HP engine in the OP' car is not what I consider a lot.

Cheers

:-)

I am looking forward to some warmer weather to properly test the new bigger direct port nozzles.

Good to hear you car is still running strong.
...........
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 29-03-2016, 08:53 PM
Iguanapeluda Iguanapeluda is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Spain
Posts: 17
Default Re: Direct Port EVO IX rs HFS3

Well....Today I have removed my intake manifold and the surprise is that the cleaning of the intake valves...






And the intake manifold



And the shippment of Aquamist...all perfect:

Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 29-03-2016, 09:11 PM
Richard L Richard L is offline
Manufacturer sponsor
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: England
Posts: 4,936
Default Re: Direct Port EVO IX rs HFS3

Have you been running water injection before the strip down?

I can see your toys have arrived...
__________________
Richard L
aquamist technical support
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 29-03-2016, 10:33 PM
Iguanapeluda Iguanapeluda is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Spain
Posts: 17
Default Re: Direct Port EVO IX rs HFS3

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard L View Post
Have you been running water injection before the strip down?

I can see your toys have arrived...

hi Richard, the toys are all perfect to install it..

The first question I donīt knock translate exacly "strip down"..sorry
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 29-03-2016, 11:00 PM
Richard L Richard L is offline
Manufacturer sponsor
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: England
Posts: 4,936
Default Re: Direct Port EVO IX rs HFS3

I meant before the manifold was taken off.
__________________
Richard L
aquamist technical support
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 29-03-2016, 11:03 PM
Iguanapeluda Iguanapeluda is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Spain
Posts: 17
Default Re: Direct Port EVO IX rs HFS3

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard L View Post
I meant before the manifold was taken off.
No no, my car doesnīt have meth, this is my first time that I have to install it and I want to try understand this system with a dyno day....

you will help me in 1 month...
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 30-03-2016, 07:16 AM
Richard L Richard L is offline
Manufacturer sponsor
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: England
Posts: 4,936
Default Re: Direct Port EVO IX rs HFS3

The inlet tracts are very clean so I though you might have w/m injection before.
__________________
Richard L
aquamist technical support
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 30-03-2016, 10:43 PM
Iguanapeluda Iguanapeluda is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Spain
Posts: 17
Default Re: Direct Port EVO IX rs HFS3

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard L View Post
The inlet tracts are very clean so I though you might have w/m injection before.
Yes, there are very clean, and this engine never has installed Meth, I know the last driverīs.

Well...What number do you like more?


Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 30-03-2016, 10:56 PM
Richard L Richard L is offline
Manufacturer sponsor
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: England
Posts: 4,936
Default Re: Direct Port EVO IX rs HFS3

If you are referring to the direct port jets, 1 is good.
__________________
Richard L
aquamist technical support
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 30-03-2016, 11:10 PM
Iguanapeluda Iguanapeluda is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Spain
Posts: 17
Default Re: Direct Port EVO IX rs HFS3

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard L View Post
If you are referring to the direct port jets, 1 is good.
Yes is for the direct port, I think that in the mark number 1 don`t have the suficient time to evaporate or mix with the air...jaja

But if you say me number 1. Tomorrow I will put in this place.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.