waterinjection.info  

Go Back   waterinjection.info > Injection Applications (making it work) > Gasoline Forced-Induction

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 27-02-2016, 10:06 PM
rudyevo9MR rudyevo9MR is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Trinidad
Posts: 8
Default Re: System recommendation for direct port evo ix

Learning alot...thanks.

From earlier posts, given the speed of the air in the intake, even if the water / meth mixture is 'centrifuged' out of the air stream onto the walls of the intake, would the air flow cause it to evaporate and add same knock suppression/ higher octane benefit?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 27-02-2016, 11:38 PM
rotrex rotrex is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 187
Default Re: System recommendation for direct port evo ix

The Methanol still will act as fuel as it rapidly evaporates in the cylinder. A significant fraction of the water will enter the cylinder in big drops and essentially do nothing.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 28-02-2016, 01:02 AM
rudyevo9MR rudyevo9MR is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Trinidad
Posts: 8
Default Re: System recommendation for direct port evo ix

What's the phase relationship when water and meth mix?

Will the meth evaporate out of the mix whilst in the intake..leaving water droplets...and/or will the act of evaporation also cause some of the water to change state from liquid to gas or break it up into finer liquid particles?

Asking to learn...not trying to be difficult...many thanks rotrex
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 28-02-2016, 01:49 PM
rotrex rotrex is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 187
Default Re: System recommendation for direct port evo ix

no, they both will evaporate about as fast as their vapour pressure at the present temperature and concentrations of already evaporated methanol or water respectively will dictate.
There is some influence on the overall evaporation rate due to some physiochemical effects like azeotropic effect, change in surface tension, evaporation vs. diffusion to the droplet surface as viscosity also changes nonlinearity with the mixing ratio etc, but for the big part, methanol will evaporate very fast leaving mostly water behind in the liquid state. Due to evaporative cooling, the cooler droplets of water will evaporate even slower.

If you experience residual knock, you may just add more flow to compensate for the losses into big drops. As long as your ignition copes, you can just add more.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 28-02-2016, 03:43 PM
Flr Power Flr Power is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 62
Default Re: System recommendation for direct port evo ix

rotrex, what is your definition of residual knock?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 29-02-2016, 10:34 PM
blue blue is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 28
Default Re: System recommendation for direct port evo ix

Some good info here
I get your main point that the goldilocks option is the worst one in this scenario
But with many of us running high percentage of water mixes will the extra distance really help that much
Or is it just more surface area to stick or puddle on Especially if it has to pass an intercooler of some sort?
__________________
blue
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-03-2016, 11:06 PM
rotrex rotrex is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 187
Default Re: System recommendation for direct port evo ix

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flr Power View Post
rotrex, what is your definition of residual knock?
I mean with this that you cannot get to Maximum Brake Torque (MBT) through timing or at least getting close. In other words, if you are still significantly knock limited.
"Residual" was probably not the right word to use in this context I admit.

regarding injection further upstream, one has to take into consideration that smaller droplets more easily pass bends and intercoolers.
Also in high boost applications, the turbocharger's output is very hot and can evaporate a fair amount of fluid.
This no black and white. These are just factors why some need more or some need less mix or different ratios to get to the same results.

Last edited by rotrex; 01-03-2016 at 11:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.