waterinjection.info  

Go Back   waterinjection.info > Aquamist specific system Q and A and new products > Aquamist HFS-3 forum

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 13-09-2017, 12:21 AM
pmbrunelle pmbrunelle is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Canada
Posts: 2
Default Questions regarding FAV

I would be interested in using an Aquamist FAV, but not a complete Aquamist system.

Thus, I have some questions regarding use of the valve.

Car specs:
1985 Pontiac Fiero 3.2L V6
turbo, non-intercooled
MegaSquirt 2 programmable fuel injection (controlling the FAV directly)
Injection 5" from the intake valves, via 6 check-valved nozzles
Pressurized water/methanol tank (compressed air) (not sure I trust those diaphragm pumps)



From the FAV web page, it says: "Always use 99% methanol". Is it acceptable to use the FAV with water?

With regards to hydrocarbons, is the FAV really that sensitive? If I am drilling/tapping the water/methanol reservoir, will even cutting fluid residues damage the FAV?

How do I choose between the 1300 cc and 1600 cc FAV for my application? What are the differences?

I have read this thread: http://www.aquamist.co.uk/forum2/vbu...ead.php?t=2922
what limits the PWM frequency to 30 Hz?
I was thinking of controlling the FAV like a standard port injector; one pulse per two crankshaft revolutions.
However, with a 6000 RPM redline, the valve would be working at 50 Hz.
Is the opening time a limiting factor? If I use a peak-and-hold driver, can I reduce the opening time?
Can I clamp to a voltage higher than 75 V to close the FAV faster?

Is the speed of the FAV influenced by the supply pressure?



...and not really FAV-specific, but more generally regarding water injection:
From the HFS3-v3.1 page, I saw the following recommendation:
"100% water: 10-15% water/fuel ratio or 0-5-1cc per BHP"

From NACA Report 756
Low octance fuel: tested up to 1.5 water/fuel with good results
High octane fuel: tested up to 0.6 water/fuel with good results

Why do you recommend such low water flow compared to Report 756?
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.