![]() |
Flow vs Pressure
1 Attachment(s)
I am making this thread to ease my mind that I am going the right route.
This Aquamist graph shows that with an Aquamist nozzle of 1.2mm @ 160psi the pump is able to flow 600cc. If you use 4 x 1.2mm nozzles will the pump be able to flow 600cc x 4 = 2400cc? |
Re: Flow vs Pressure
No, it won't flow 2400cc/min. This is because the pump cannot sustain 160 psi at 2400cc/min. You need a more powerful pump.
|
Re: Flow vs Pressure
Quote:
|
Re: Flow vs Pressure
The maximum flow at 160psi is approximately 1600cc/min. This is the aquatec 5800-series pump.
All pumps on the market are quoting "dead-headed" pressure. Totally meaningless. As soon as the spray starts, the pressure will drop. Higher "dead head" pressure setting will drop much faster than a lower "dead-head" pressure setting. |
Re: Flow vs Pressure
Quote:
A - 1 Pump = 1600cc @ 160psi = (400cc x 4 nozzles) Good for mixing 75% pump fuel and 25% Water/Methanol B - 2 Parrallel Pumps = 3200cc @ 160psi = (800cc x 4 nozzles) Good for mixing 50% pump fuel and 50% Water/Methanol C - 2 Series Pumps = 1600cc @ 320psi = (400cc x 4 nozzles) BEST for mixing 75% pump fuel and 25% Water/Methanol. SUPER FINE MIST D - 3 Parallel Pumps = 4800cc @ 160psi = (1200cc x 4 nozzles) Good for mixing 25% pump fuel and 75% Water/Methanol E - 2 Parrallel + 2 Series Pumps = 3200cc @ 320psi = (800cc x 4 nozzles) BEST for mixing 50% pump fuel and 50% Water/Methanol. SUPER FINE MIST F - 4 Parallel Pumps = 6400cc @ 160psi = (1600cc x 4 nozzles) BEST for operating engine @ 100% Water/Methanol injection Calculating Fuel flow for 400Bhp @ 1.2 BSFC 100% Methanol = 1260cc/min x 4nozzles. Using 25/75 Water/Meth, one should compensate for water flow and Setup F configuration of 4 Parrallel Pumps would be needed. Calculating Horsepower loss per WATT taking account pump is operating at 14Volts x 10Amps 1 Pump = 140Watt = 0.19Hp loss 2 Pump = 280Watt = 0.38Hp loss 3 Pump = 420Watt = 0.57Hp loss 4 Pump = 560Watt = 0.75Hp loss Maximum of 1Hp loss @ 100% Meth fuel injection. Is it worth it ? What is your point of view Richard ? |
Re: Flow vs Pressure
Are you trying to flow 1600cc/min of methanol per cylinder at 160psi?
Just use one large pump with a "return to tank" pressure regulator is best. This is because the pressure drop across the entire flow range in not linear. You will experience starting problem in cold morning, much worse than ethanol due to high latent heat value of methanol. |
Re: Flow vs Pressure
1600cc what I calculated, It could be more or less but better be prepared for much than for less.
If you know one big pump ready for methanol able to use 150+psi pressure and flow 6400cc/min please share. I will not have issues with starting cause I will work with pump fuel for starting/idle/cruising/low boost. At certain boost levels the base fuel will eventually be replaced by methanol injection. Seems like the best possible setup a street car should actually have although I am ready for critics to say their way. |
Re: Flow vs Pressure
I don't know of any pump and can run at 160psi continuously.
They might be able to make you one: http://www.micropump.com/product_overview.aspx |
Re: Flow vs Pressure
I would suggest you use a different architecture
Set of petrol fuel injectors at the OEM install location for petrol 2nd set of methanol compatible fuel injectors further up the intake runner or pre turbo fed by a methanol compatible fuel pump with a pressure regulater and return line into a small fuel cell, say 10l. Essentially a second fuel system. This way you get all the flow you want with the control you want. This has been done before and it works great. Use your current water injection system to spray any water you need or want on top of that. As flow requeirements are now much reduced, use your current system as is. You may add 15% methanol to the water tank to keep it sterile. There is no need to inject methanol and water at once as a mix. It has its merits, but I would not try to build a classic water injection system with membrane pumps to provide the entire fueling of a car. There are suitable and reliable pumps,fuel lines, connectors, fuel pressure regulators and injectors on the market for just that. Fuel injectors will also give you the precise metering capability out need for the same money as 4 water/meth valves and jets. They are plug and play to any ECU with 2nd injector bank capability such as the Emerald K3 I am using. Hondata will likely support this as well. Besides methanol those pumps, injectors etc. would also be E85 compatible if you shall have the desire to try it. It is more stable than pure methanol and available at petrol stations. You could also run a mix of e85 and methanol. You gain flexibility. Run petrol off boost and it automatically switches to e85/methanol, 100% ethanol etc. as you wish. Water comes on top of this from the system you already have. If you go that far, do it right. |
Re: Flow vs Pressure
Couple of issues need to be addressed:
1. All wetted part has to be water resistance, if you are not running 100% methanol. 2. There are no high pressure fuel pump on the market that exceeds 100psi Why not replace gasoline with methanol in the fuel tank, switch to a methanol map. |
Re: Flow vs Pressure
ANSWERS IN CAPS
Quote:
|
Re: Flow vs Pressure
Quote:
|
Re: Flow vs Pressure
Thinking back at the configuration of the injection setup :
Trial number 1 100% Water Mixture : Would be using 4 pumps : two in series and two in parallel. From experience and studies when injecting water the primary aspect is droplet size. Droplet size works in direct relation to pressure. The more pressure used, the less the droplet size is. Working 2pumps in series would achieve a pressure of 320-400Psi . Nozzle size is still unknown although positioning two nozzles one pre-turbo and one post turbo could be enough. Direct port would be ideal for non-balanced plenums as not all cylinders could benefit equally from the setup. The problem is that water would not have enough time to evaporate if "large" nozzles are used. Combination of direct and post/pre turbo total of Six nozzle would be the best viable option for best distribution and cooling. |
Re: Flow vs Pressure
Fuel injectors, also ones for methanol, only need 45PSI. So any alcohol compatible fuel pump should do.
If you use a methanol compatible fuel cell, e.g. Small steel tank, there is no issue with having it in the car. The tank is vented as any other fuel tank. The boiling point of methanol is not that low. Folks use plastic canisters of methanol to run fuel cells in their camper vans. They typically are used in hot areas. |
Re: Flow vs Pressure
Check flow rates of air assisted foggers. Some have rather high flow rates.
|
Re: Flow vs Pressure
Quote:
https://www.moranmotorsports.com/pro...mizer-injector Cost : $188 x 4 = $752 = £518 Aquamist Jets = £35 x 4 = £140 And that is only injectors.... A high flow methanol pump like Aeromotive costs more than 6 pumps altogether apart fuel regulator and engine management.... Fuel tanks: I always so plastic tanks in methanol setups and in a way I like it. Steel tend to heat the liquid more plus could be prone to corrosion plus it is more expensive and "heavier" aswell. To be exact methanol's boiling point is 64.7DegC. Let the car sit for a few hours in the sun on a summer day. I am sure you will see 60+DegC in it (tried and tested). Liquid inside would be less though.... just taking pre-cautions... |
Re: Flow vs Pressure
Quote:
- There is also issue regarding using an intermittent pump for continuous duty. - 300-400psi line pressure will impede the operation of and inline valve. |
Re: Flow vs Pressure
3 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Re: Flow vs Pressure
The injection control valve will only work to some max. Pressure. Check the data sheet of the valve you use.
Doubling pressure only gains you some 40% more flow. Pipe fittings become challenging at such high pressure. The pump case might not sustain 450PSI vs. the outside and leak or crack. The serial arrangement is not necessary. Just use them in parallel and get the jets yOu need for the flow you need. you can always just add more. My system is based on the old AM 2c system. I have now replaced the race pump with a Flotec pump. Otherwise it stil works the same. 150 PSI rail pressure buffered by a accumulator. The mix is metered by a HSV PWM control valve. I think AM now seems a FAV (fast acting valve). My flow indication is the pump running indicated by a LED: if it blinks or illuminates, the mix is flowing. The faster it blinks, the more I flow. There is no reason to build something like this, just with 4 pumps and the according number of jets. Likely a single FAV will flow enough. Fuel injectors are ethanol and fuel compatible these days. MEthnaol compatible injectros are likely identical except someone did the effort to test compatibility. Common to all fuel injectors is that they cannot tolerate water similar to fuel pumps with ther fuel cooled rotors. They corrode from the water. You need special metering valves that are designed to be compatible with with water. They are not common. Aquamist is one of the few (actually the only one) selling those. I have a HSV under ECU control and it is one fine piece of valve. Current modulation frequency is set to 80Hz. Pure methanol corrodes aluminium if exposed over prolonged periods of time in a container, especially if contaminated by acids or bases breaking down the passivity on layer of aluminium. Water reduces this effect. That is why storing 50:50 mixes causes no issues. Are you sure your race fuel shop cannot provide race spec e85? It would make your life much easier as you could use mostly common fuel pumps and injectors for a secondary injection system. Then again, add water as necessary with your current WMI system. |
Re: Flow vs Pressure
Quote:
- High pressure demands high current. Hight current means heat rise. The Aquatec specification is quite vague, " ... some pump can run for hours .... " - I cannot see a valve that will work at 450psi at 1600cc/min. Certain not from us. |
Re: Flow vs Pressure
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Re: Flow vs Pressure
Quote:
|
Re: Flow vs Pressure
I was referring to a PWM valve, not a checkvalve.
|
Re: Flow vs Pressure
Quote:
Option 1 : All 4 PWM control valves wired together so they activate all together according duty cycle managed by ecu map. Option 2 : Each PWM control valve connected to primary injectors (example injector 1 with PWM nozzle 1 etc..) Since the injection needs to happen on boost the ecu switches on pumps when the engine is on boost and manage flow according PWM duty cycle managed by ecu map. What do you think Richard/Rotrex ? |
Re: Flow vs Pressure
As the jets mostly flow all the time under boost,I.e. Valve is open, you might get away with a single or two fast acting valves. Timed sequencial injection has little benefits for what you want to do.
Richard should know the max flow rate of the current fast acting valve FAV. |
Re: Flow vs Pressure
There are two FAVs with flow rates 1600cc (806-239) and 1300cc (standard 806-239B).
|
Re: Flow vs Pressure
Quote:
I am trying to find find one that actually can work with 100% water if possible. Any ideas Richard? |
Re: Flow vs Pressure
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Aquamist FAV : Warning: never run hydrocarbon contaminated fluid through this valve. The internal EPDM seal is subject to severe swelling if 99% pure methanol is not used. Always use 99% methanol from a factory sealed canister. Transfer pump or jugs should be free of any previous hydrocarbon usage. Washing the container with detergent will not stop methanol drawing out the hydrocarbon from a plastic container laced with gasoline. Aquamist Pump : Warning: Prolonged use of 100% methanol may cause premature pump failure and may not be covered under warranty - this warning applies to all Aquatec pumps. Is this contradictory? 99% Methanol may damage pump while less may damage FAV.... |
Re: Flow vs Pressure
He just means 99% purity methanol, but this mixed with distilled water.
Richard, can the older HSV take a ethanol / water mix? Ethanol is way cheaper than methanol for me here in Germany. |
Re: Flow vs Pressure
The HSV has EPDM seals, OK with methanol or ethanol as long as it is 99% pure.
|
Re: Flow vs Pressure
Quote:
|
Re: Flow vs Pressure
I meant 99% pure methanol without traces of hydrocarbon.
|
Re: Flow vs Pressure
Quote:
I have just remembered your set up is based on progressive pump speed (PPS) rather PWM valve. Ignore my PWM valve remarks. If you are flow this large amount, I am not sure the PPS algorithm will work satisfactorily due to the non-linearity and dynamic range. |
Re: Flow vs Pressure
Actually I am still determined to find the best setup PPS or PWM . The question is finding the right components that work efficiently without too much complexity and too much expenses
|
Re: Flow vs Pressure
I personally like the PWM set-up.
Initially it was a Aquamist 2c. Since the race pump dropped in flow rate, I have replaced it with a 160PSI 2.xl/min pump of eBay for €26!. The harness works for the most part except that the pump flow indicator LED is now driven by the 12V line after the pump's micro switch. The pump has a integrated pressure switch. It stops at about 10bar. Once pressure drops below 8 bar, the pump automatically activates itself. The switch closing fires also the LED. This is my flow indicator. As in the 2c system, I maintained the 30cc accumulator. This dampens the pump switching cycles. So overall it behalfs like a fuel injection system with pump based pressure control. A bit more crude, but hey. With this system you end up with a line that is permanently pressurized with your mix. Next you need to control flow. For this purpose Aquamists sells very suitable valves. I have the older HSV (high speed valve). Now they sell a version called FAV (fast acting valve). The valve is controlled by my ECU. I use a boost control map with PWM output for this purpose. Most ECUs feature auxiliary PWM maps. The boost control map in open loop mode allows to set a PWM percentage based on throttle position vs. rpm. This allows me to deterministically set my injection onset and flow rates over the rpm range. The beauty is the proportionality of PWM. If I set it to 70%, I get about 70% of the max. flow rate, if I set it to 30%, I get about 30% flow. It makes the injection a very reproducible and mappable process. I do not need any Hobbs switches to control the system. I still have one to automatically switch to a non WMI map once rail pressure drops below like 5 bar. Cableing is simple. 12V and ground to the loom, LED and tank level lines to the front., 1 wire from the ECU to control the HSV and 1 line for the map switch as a fail safety. There is no separate controller and its associated wiring and adjustment knobs. It is all ECU controlled. Under PWM control, you get spray even at low flow rates as during each opening of the HSV, a full pressure wave passes through the line to the jets. I can test the pump by pressuring the throttle with the engine stopped. Over the last 25% of the throttle the valve opens from 0 to 100%. It works beautifully and you get spray over a big part of the control range. Pump speed based systems only increase flow by about 40% for a doubling of the pressure. This is probably why those 250PSI pumps are so popular. You need the dynamic range on the top to get a sufficent controllable flow range as at low pressures, spray is poor. If you change jet size, all the scaling does not work anymore as pressure vs. flow is now changed. Exception are internal bypass pumps with a constant pressure. |
Re: Flow vs Pressure
Hello!
Sorry for jumping in but actually I'm not replying to this post but as a new comer into the forum, I just want to say hello to you old folks. Thanks |
Re: Flow vs Pressure
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Anyway, just spent some time checking other Aquatec pumps particularly the 550 Series and the 230Volt series. I made a chart for you to review. Notes : - The 230Volts consume more power than the 12V series but flow slightly better - The 550series have double the flow or more the 5800series but they are not capable to withstand pressures for long period of time Taking into account the rate of evaporation of Methanol vs Gasoline. If gasoline fuel injection systems work with 45psi to 80psi would methanol injection systems need less pressure to vaporize the fuel ? So why do I need 160psi pressure if I could be good with 80psi @ Pure Meth? What about Water/Meth mixtures would I still have good evaporation @ 80psi and W25/M75 ? |
Re: Flow vs Pressure
If you just want to get the methanol to burn in the cylinder as a fuel, the spray quality (small droplet size and narrow distribution) is not as important as if you like to preferentially cool the air. For water this is even more important as its evaporation speed is so low.
For methanol as a fuel and power as the main objective with emissions lower on the list, you get away with a crude spray. Most of the fuel, being petrol or methanol or ethanol evaporates hitting the hot valves and combustion chamber walls. Hydraulic nozzles produce finer mist at higher pressures. This is where the need for high pressures come from. Making fine mist of water or water / meth mix. Air assitted nozzles work with much lower fluid pressures, but for very high flow rates, need high air pressures. Fuel injectors have overcome this droplet size to a degree by adding holes to the injectors with some having as much as 12 holes, e.g. The Denso injectors for the 2003-2009 Toyota Prius. For this car this was done to achieve a very fast fuel evaporation and homogenous distribution lowering emissions. Lean pockets increase Nox emissions, rich pockets CO and HC. so yes, for pure methanol or mixes high in methanol content, you get away with bigger droplets. This is why I proposed a methanol or ethanol compatible secondary fuel injector system. But unfortunatly your ECU does not support it. the LED is crude, but all I need. Closed loop fueling, a very fast knock controller and pressure based fail safety take care of the rest. If it fails, I get misfires and knock. Nothing brakes. I have tried it when the race pump dropped in flow and for a strange reason the priming pump controller was also not activated anymore by the pressure switch of the race pump. fitting a membrane pump solved this. I have a spare on in the shelf shall I got problems again. This is new pump I got on eBay, except it says 1.1 Mpa on the label instead of 1 Mpa as on the picture. I cut the barbs off and cut 1/8" threats into the plastic to fit pushy on connectors. http://g03.a.alicdn.com/kf/HTB1pExxG...Xq6xXFXXXe.jpg |
Re: Flow vs Pressure
3 Attachment(s)
ANSWER IN CAPS
Quote:
|
Re: Flow vs Pressure
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:53 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.