View Single Post
  #242  
Old 13-08-2005, 09:39 PM
masterp2 masterp2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Desert SW, Arizona USA
Posts: 86
Default

Just my 2 cents. This will be a significant restriction, with air moving over it at over 100 mph. I see a possible flow issue. I would taper each side to a V.

Also, if it is possible to integrate the mount, such that no cross sectional area is lost at that location (larger diameter chamber that flairs back to normal) that might mitigate head loss.
__________________
Michael Patton (aka Killerbee)
Reply With Quote