waterinjection.info  

Go Back   waterinjection.info > Injection Applications (making it work) > Gasoline Forced-Induction

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 24-07-2007, 08:43 PM
keithmac keithmac is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: York / UK
Posts: 151
Default Heatsoaked intercoolers, pre intercooler injection?.

I`ve read on here a few times that post IC injection is prefered because the IC is more efficient with a higher temp diferential between the ambient air going around it and the hot charge going through it which is fair enough. The problem I`m having though is my IC`s are heatsoaking after hard back to back runs.

At the moment my setup consists of 6x0.3mm nozzles in a port injection setup, I`ve bought a bigger pump to supply more flow and I`m adding 2 more nozzles to my system (twin turbo), probably 1mm jets. I`m leaning on the side of fitting the jets just after the turbos to give maximum time in the airflow to cool it and also to help the IC`s out. First tests will be with a 50/50 water meth mix but if the car bogs badly due to overwatering I`ll got 75%meth and then 100%, trimming the fuel to suit.

Before I got hacking away at my car I`d just like to here and obvious negative points on going for pre-IC injection and also if anyone`s running it at the moment?.

Cheers, Keith.
__________________
VW Mk2 Golf 16VG60 - Mitsubishi GTO TT
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 30-07-2007, 08:23 AM
JohnA JohnA is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 352
Default

Keith,

One thing I'd consider is the different mixes that are optimal for each location.

In-cylinder cooling works best with more water, while charge cooling works better with more methanol.

So you might hit trade-offs pretty quickly, one hand giveth, other hand taketh away.

Why not use a different pump/mix for the intercooling jets? This way you can even have different activation points as well. :smile:
__________________
Cheers,

John

www.max-boost.co.uk
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 30-07-2007, 02:58 PM
Dust Dust is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Frankfort, Kentucky
Posts: 227
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnA
Keith,

One thing I'd consider is the different mixes that are optimal for each location.

In-cylinder cooling works best with more water, while charge cooling works better with more methanol.

So you might hit trade-offs pretty quickly, one hand giveth, other hand taketh away.

Why not use a different pump/mix for the intercooling jets? This way you can even have different activation points as well. :smile:
I agree, if you already have two pumps, run one for each, and maybe even spray the outside of the IC.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 30-07-2007, 07:05 PM
keithmac keithmac is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: York / UK
Posts: 151
Default

That`s not a bad idea, I could use the Aquamist pump to supply water only port injected and use the Shurflo pump for injecting a Methanol mix post turbo.

At the moment I`ve got a 1mm jet to the rear turbo outlet, a 0.8mm jet on the front turbo outlet and the port injection setup. I`ve not had chance to drive it after the changes but total volume of water/metanol will be around the 1400cc/min region.

Will let you know how I get on after I`ve had a chance to tune and play around with the mixtures.
__________________
VW Mk2 Golf 16VG60 - Mitsubishi GTO TT
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.