waterinjection.info  

Go Back   waterinjection.info > Injection Applications (making it work) > Gasoline Forced-Induction

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #241  
Old 13-08-2005, 08:12 PM
JohnA JohnA is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 352
Default

Yeah, teardrop profile, that would be ideal (tears of joy :lol: )
__________________
Cheers,

John

www.max-boost.co.uk
Reply With Quote
  #242  
Old 13-08-2005, 09:39 PM
masterp2 masterp2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Desert SW, Arizona USA
Posts: 86
Default

Just my 2 cents. This will be a significant restriction, with air moving over it at over 100 mph. I see a possible flow issue. I would taper each side to a V.

Also, if it is possible to integrate the mount, such that no cross sectional area is lost at that location (larger diameter chamber that flairs back to normal) that might mitigate head loss.
__________________
Michael Patton (aka Killerbee)
Reply With Quote
  #243  
Old 13-08-2005, 09:59 PM
Richard L Richard L is offline
Manufacturer sponsor
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: England
Posts: 4,941
Default

Which "side" are you referring to?

The ID of the fitting is the same as the ID of the turbo flange.

Just sized the images after anodising. You should be able to see the sides better.



__________________
Richard L
aquamist technical support
Reply With Quote
  #244  
Old 13-08-2005, 10:44 PM
masterp2 masterp2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Desert SW, Arizona USA
Posts: 86
Default

When airflow gets to the fitting, it will either have the additional obstacle (restriction) to overcome.

That pic looks nice, a sharp V on the fins, if the backside tapers back to a V the same way, good job. I would just "round" the transition, instead of the flatspot or angle change. If you like, you can widen the fins, in the effort to make them as thin as practical, the idea being invisible to the airstream.

With respect to the ID of the fitting, if you can enlargen it just a bit, in a blended curvature, so that no x-sectional area is lost (from the addition of this beautiful cut piece) that will help minimize head loss as a suction side restriction (the worst kind).

The last thing you want is a failure due to cavitation. that is what I fear. And larger diameter, at the fin location, may help.
__________________
Michael Patton (aka Killerbee)
Reply With Quote
  #245  
Old 13-08-2005, 11:04 PM
Richard L Richard L is offline
Manufacturer sponsor
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: England
Posts: 4,941
Default

Thanks for the advice and useful suggestions. I will thicken up the fins for the next time but will do for the time being.

At present the holder ID is identical with the turbo flange ID. See picture below. There are no breaks - red circle. As far as the air is concern, it cannot see the gap at the intersection. The chamfer on the OD is gone on the anodised version.

I will also round off the tapered fin to minimise any notch developing. It is knife sharp at the moment.

__________________
Richard L
aquamist technical support
Reply With Quote
  #246  
Old 13-08-2005, 11:07 PM
masterp2 masterp2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Desert SW, Arizona USA
Posts: 86
Default

Like I said before, I'm impressed. Good luck!
__________________
Michael Patton (aka Killerbee)
Reply With Quote
  #247  
Old 13-08-2005, 11:16 PM
Richard L Richard L is offline
Manufacturer sponsor
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: England
Posts: 4,941
Default

I will report the results as soon as I have it. I am keep my fingers crossed and hope the fins hold up. I cannot not rob any more machine room time anymore.
__________________
Richard L
aquamist technical support
Reply With Quote
  #248  
Old 14-08-2005, 12:22 AM
Greenv8s Greenv8s is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 26
Default

That's a beautiful piece of machining and I look forward to hearing how well it works. As a non-turbo user this is the first time I've looked at the insides of a turbo this closely. It looks as if there is an abrupt contraction just downstream of your new fitting. Is that real, or is it an optical illusion? If it's real I imagine it's there for a reason but I can't see what the reason would be.
__________________
Peter Humphries (and a green V8S)
Reply With Quote
  #249  
Old 14-08-2005, 08:58 AM
Roverdose Roverdose is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: stevenage
Posts: 23
Default

that does look fantastic. just wondering about the water feed pipe.

how do you get those small filters in the jets? do you screw the barbed pipe part into the base?
if you did, could you then machine a thread onto the turbo side of the plate, and screw the jet onto it.

so you would have a thread on the outside of here..


and a cone on the other side to help flow.

then machine a hole into one of the fins to get the water to the jet.

if you see what i mean?

Drew
Reply With Quote
  #250  
Old 27-08-2005, 12:55 AM
Richard L Richard L is offline
Manufacturer sponsor
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: England
Posts: 4,941
Default

The water will be channeled into the jet via the rails, possible redesigned the jet jet to accept water on the side, similar arrangement as the side inlet fuel injectors.

The tail of the jet will be a cone shaped nut, as described by you.
__________________
Richard L
aquamist technical support
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.