rarson
09-03-2006, 01:01 AM
Okay, please forgive me, but I think I don't understand.
I was under the impression, from reading on this forum, that turbocharger compression was adiabatic, because it heats the air up as it compresses.
Then I read about Smokey Yunick's adiabatic engine (http://www.schou.dk/hvce/?mode=2) (which I had never seen before) which seems to imply that heat is neither gained nor lost. Dictionary.com give this definition: "occurring without loss or gain of heat."
I swear I'm not stupid, but can someone explain this to me? I have a feeling that it's got to do with the system as a whole, but I must admit I don't fully understand the usage of the same word in these two situations.
I was under the impression, from reading on this forum, that turbocharger compression was adiabatic, because it heats the air up as it compresses.
Then I read about Smokey Yunick's adiabatic engine (http://www.schou.dk/hvce/?mode=2) (which I had never seen before) which seems to imply that heat is neither gained nor lost. Dictionary.com give this definition: "occurring without loss or gain of heat."
I swear I'm not stupid, but can someone explain this to me? I have a feeling that it's got to do with the system as a whole, but I must admit I don't fully understand the usage of the same word in these two situations.