waterinjection.info  

Go Back   waterinjection.info > Injection Theory (what it is and what it does) > General Effects

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 24-11-2004, 09:45 PM
pyaap pyaap is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 11
Default Water Injection in turbocharged Volvos

Hi,

I've come across a post on a website in response to a question posted by a guy who is keen on fitting water injection to his car. One of the replies claims that WI is not suitable on turbocharged Volvos and some other cars. Is there any sense to be made of what this guy making these claims is trying to say?

A link to the website is: http://volvo-t5.co.uk/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=1546
If you can't access the page, here is a copy of the text:

"it is absolutely not worth it for the follwing reason -

volvo designed the inlet manifolds so the air flows into them then up and around into the engine. with this design , as the air flow goes up and around, the water vapour will drop out of the airstream as it is heavier. and as a result you loose any benefits from the water injection such as preventing pinking , and all the water would gather at the bottom of the inlet manifold

a better solution is to use an intercooler spray preferably co2 or n2o as they are much colder than the water anyway. these intercooler kits are available from ?180 +vat so are much cheaper than aquamist.. the only downside being you've got to get gas refills and water is readily available .

dont get me wrong though guys i'm not saying water injection doesnt work , it's just that for the reasons i have stated above it is not suitable for our volvo's . new mini's apparently have the same problem"
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 24-11-2004, 11:20 PM
Richard L Richard L is offline
Manufacturer sponsor
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: England
Posts: 4,936
Default Re: Water Injection in turbocharged Volvos

Quote:
Originally Posted by pyaap
Hi,

I've come across a post on a website in response to a question posted by a guy who is keen on fitting water injection to his car. One of the replies claims that WI is not suitable on turbocharged Volvos and some other cars. Is there any sense to be made of what this guy making these claims is trying to say?

A link to the website is: http://volvo-t5.co.uk/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=1546
If you can't access the page, here is a copy of the text:

"it is absolutely not worth it for the follwing reason -

volvo designed the inlet manifolds so the air flows into them then up and around into the engine. with this design , as the air flow goes up and around, the water vapour will drop out of the airstream as it is heavier. and as a result you loose any benefits from the water injection such as preventing pinking , and all the water would gather at the bottom of the inlet manifold

a better solution is to use an intercooler spray preferably co2 or n2o as they are much colder than the water anyway. these intercooler kits are available from ?180 +vat so are much cheaper than aquamist.. the only downside being you've got to get gas refills and water is readily available .

dont get me wrong though guys i'm not saying water injection doesnt work , it's just that for the reasons i have stated above it is not suitable for our volvo's . new mini's apparently have the same problem"
I have seen this email before, cannot quite make out the what the guy was trying to say. Water in all forms, large droplet, mist, vapour, etc will all go into the engine during boost conditions - 5-10Kg of air travelling at almost supersonic speed will not allow anything to stay around very long including a big bolt (don't try that).

Sorry it just doesn't make sense. Here is a Volvo we sponsored and doing very well with an Aquamist 2d. It was racing in the European Endurance Racing Series Competition this year.

The car's ECU was tuned in Sweden by a Volvo Engineer.

__________________
Richard L
aquamist technical support
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 24-11-2004, 11:50 PM
pyaap pyaap is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 11
Default

I too think that the guy who responded is not making accurate claims. More importantly, I don't think he has tried any WI systems to be able to actually comment accurately on them. However, I think its essential that such comments are corrected especially when they are directed at someone who is considering installing a system.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 25-11-2004, 12:09 AM
Richard L Richard L is offline
Manufacturer sponsor
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: England
Posts: 4,936
Default

I am afraid there are quite a few of these people on the internet forum speaking way beyond their knowledge and it doesn't normally make good logical sense to others.
__________________
Richard L
aquamist technical support
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 26-11-2004, 05:36 PM
pyaap pyaap is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 11
Default

Well, it seems like there are some people out there who simply don't even think about logic and that unfortunately is largely down to ignorance. But anyway, there are suggestions on that wesbite, that some of the contributors get together and put some money into fabricating a system similar to yours so I think it may be worthwhile keeping an occassional eye on what's going on there; I don't think that what they're up to is right.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 26-11-2004, 05:41 PM
pyaap pyaap is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 11
Default Re: Water Injection in turbocharged Volvos

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard L
Sorry it just doesn't make sense. Here is a Volvo we sponsored and doing very well with an Aquamist 2d. It was racing in the European Endurance Racing Series Competition this year.

The car's ECU was tuned in Sweden by a Volvo Engineer.
That Kalmar Union S60 won its class in the last Britcar race and was 4th place overall, just behind 3 race-prepped BMW M3s which had close to a 100bhp power advantage over it. Not bad at all.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 25-12-2004, 10:36 PM
Richard L Richard L is offline
Manufacturer sponsor
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: England
Posts: 4,936
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pyaap
Well, it seems like there are some people out there who simply don't even think about logic and that unfortunately is largely down to ignorance. But anyway, there are suggestions on that wesbite, that some of the contributors get together and put some money into fabricating a system similar to yours so I think it may be worthwhile keeping an occassional eye on what's going on there; I don't think that what they're up to is right.
It is fine with me regarding people developing their own system, if you search the phrase"water injection" on the net, there must be at least five companies producing alternative water injection system.

Our system took many years to develop and many minor modifications to date. It has proven to be reasonably reliable and no one can give 100% guarantee. For someone who can produce a system within a few months and ready for general distribution, I would be very surprise that it can be reliable to the point that it will meet the extremely demanding aftermarket users - form experience, it is much easier to develop a system from the professional racing teams.

I am encourged by the gradual acceptance of WI in general and new system developed must be a positive step towards the concept.
__________________
Richard L
aquamist technical support
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.