![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ww2 engineers did the tests up to 1.5:1 water to fuel.
The slope went always one way. more boost + more water = more power. So there is plenty of headroom from your 350cc jet :-) What engine is it? A 1FZ-NE? Forged pistons? Cast pistons are more often than not the first thing to go sauer. I still suggest to install charge cooling. It combines well with water injection. I have seen intake air temps drop 10-20C max using water injection. More with adding methanol, even more doing precompressor injection. Doing direct port injection, there is barely any IAT reduction, but I can still benefit to a similar degree, if not even more. I have no dyno, so can't tell you in terms of % power/torque. A 10-20C drop is rather little compared to what a charge cooler does. Even a small one will reduce IATs by 30 C or more. The decent ones get you to 10C above ambiernt, so in your case about 80-100C reduction in IAT. That is why I suggest let a charge cooler do the charge cooling and the water injection do the in-cylinder work. They both add to the performance potential. if your current tune is already at best torque, so not knock limited, you only can up the boost to get more flow/power in its current configuration. If your engines knocks before hitting best torque upon further ignition advance, add more water/methanol and try again. Where the limits of your engine build are, you need to do your own research or blow an engine. As you run no charge cooler, you may try precompressor injection. Regarding AFR, I have found that such a "lean tune" provides good power, but generates considerable heat. I have only observed this on track. 12:1 yielded about 85C coolant temp and the 13:1 about 90C on that particular day. Both were with w/m injection. Nice thing was fuel consumption was significantly lower in that session. On the road doing short burst of WOT, it probalby won't matter. temp wise My cylinder air distribution is not that uniform with Nr.1 running a tad leaner. The plenum is not designed for forced induction. The plenum chsmber has a side entry and a uniform cross section along the width. This leads to more airflow at ther first cylinder and less towards the other end. Running the engine at 12:1 keeps them all somewhere around this number. It lowers overall combustion temps and cylinder head and valve temps with it. In your case also turbo temperatures. Riceracer propagates 11.8:1. This is rich best torque. It adds safety and costs barely any power vs. a leaner all out tune. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|