waterinjection.info  

Go Back   waterinjection.info > Water/Methanol database on specific model of cars > Your one-stop search for water/methanol injected cars

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #25  
Old 24-02-2006, 07:19 PM
JohnA JohnA is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 352
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeWarner
lol - obviously you I meant Lambda, I guess I should have worded it better.).
Even lambda.
Why exactly would it have to be different?
Higher torque usually indicates better 'breathing' in that range, higher Volumetric Efficiency. More oxygen molecules per revolution.
So if fuelling adjusts to this, it will pair (say) 20% more fuel molecules to make up for 20% more oxygen molecules.
Lambda is just the ratio, it stays the same :wink:

The extra heat that might need absorbing in the combustion chambers (we're talking high-boost applications here) will be absrobed by the Water.
That is the whole idea behind this forum, isn't it?

Quote:
The Courtenay maps aim for 0.79 lambda for safety. A bit too safe I think though.
we've already been through this, and it is 0.85 that we want in this case.
Their 0.79 is a good choice for a non-WI setup.
__________________
Cheers,

John

www.max-boost.co.uk
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.